Monday, 24 December 2012

NEXT POST
Store Online In the previous article we talked about the need to use secure protocols to make economic transactions in the online store. We also mentioned the need to consider a few basic requirements to choose a secure payment system: authentication, integrity and non-repudiation. We'll see how difficult it is to meet the three requirements at the same time. With SSL, Secure Sockets Layer, the information travels encrypted so that it cannot be interfered or performed by third parties. SHTTP we have similar characteristics. They are probably most widely used by online stores security protocols. To use either of the two protocols to our shop online has to be installed on a secure server. The merchant's online store you need certified keys but the client does not. It is a user-friendly method for the customer by its simplicity, but the merchant can come up with the repudiation to the not guaranteed in the process the identity of who makes the purchase online. In some cases and in accordance with which company will install the SSL system, customer may at any time verify the validity of the certificate of the online store domain security, the owner of this certificate and the geographical location of both (web hosting). With SET, Secure Electronic Transaction, is necessary to obtain a Digital certificate issued by a certification authority that will be responsible for certifying that whoever buys it online is who they claim to be. This is a complex system that does not have many followers. The SET Root CA certifies the Brands SET between those American Express Company, Cyber-Comm, JBC Company l., MasterCard International, Nippon Shinpan C.L., PBS International, ASDankort and Visa International found. These entities are responsible for issuing the certificates online stores proprietary traders and proprietary cards customers. The certifications have a cost attached...
PREVIOUS POST
The Lie I've been a while practicing a simple personal statistics based on the valuable information that I get from my clients, students, family members, friends and acquaintances, to find out what that characteristic that more people censor and least they forgive. Without attempting to rise to rank of theory obtained concluded, I very much agree with the end result because for me it is also the same: the lie. There are many definitions of lie, but especially one picked up much of what is and also what behaves: action and effect of say something different to the truth I like this meaning as to what we all understand as lie (distort the truth) added their potential consequences, in reality the essential element and more login of the harp. There are those who consider that, depending on the type of lie, its consequences can be positive or negative and therefore one is not bad is yours, if not in terms of what entails. Without ascending to high philosophical disquisition (Plato, Aristotle, Augustine, Kant, Tomas de Aquino, etc. already did very well), I think not equal: for me, all lying is unacceptable, whatever their consequences, both good and bad. Sincerely believe that it should not lie, the truth being one of the major backbones of our Western culture values, never is must distort, which does not oblige manifest always and in its entirety, not constituting this deceived some if not limitation appropriate information because of the circumstances. The difficulty of not lying and also where appropriate to prevent damage, lies in how much and how communicate truth. Those who defend las Mentiras piadosas or therapeutic, do so before its shortage of resources to face situations with enough ingenuity as to respond as appropriate, and without ever betraying that we all want to find...