Friday, 26 October 2012

Municipal Infrastructure: No One Wants To Overpay Do not be mistaken, saying that the problem of municipal networks in Russia today is one of the most acute. Investment in housing is for investors to low-yielding, and because commercial organizations prefer to send funds in other sectors of the construction industry. According to many, investment in this sector not only liquid, but are a direct appreciation of the building. In addition, existing tariffs in the sphere of housing outside the law bounded above, it can not hold investors. Many writers such as more information offer more in-depth analysis. Funding mechanism for public infrastructure is still not clear, although the Town Planning Code in its latest edition provides that land under building should be sold at auction with a ready infrastructure. In the West, this practice has long been traditional. But in order to sell plots with communications, the government must invest huge money in the wiring these networks. And where is the money to take? For example, the budget of the Kirov region in 2008 involves the allocation of grants for the development of engineering infrastructure of municipalities of the region at the expense of federal budget the amount of 24 million 126 thousand rubles, and grant co-financing investment projects of social and engineering infrastructure in the amount of 166 million rubles. Is this enough? "It's no secret that the Kirov is difficult to financially region - said the executive director of the Union of construction companies of the Kirov region, Alexander Nevinsky. - It is still an unresolved issue of granting land plots with prepared infrastructure.
Election In spite of the great variety of shovels of pdel that exist, most difficult in this game it is the election of the suitable pair. The ideal when we faced the election of a pair of pdel is to fuse from the beginning but that usually is very difficult and more difficult still to maintain over the years. The level of game of both member of the pair is advisable that is similar. When teams of two people play, apparently these work better if they have aptitudes of similar level. The more even they are his respective abilities, the more probabilities must to remove the maximum benefit to the combination from these. Some keys to guess right in our election are: To be realistic the options usually are limited, since they are reduced normally to the next surroundings, and sometimes with the influence not only of sport but also personal factors. The phases of the pair These phases are: constitution, conflict, normalization, consolidation. It will be in the overcoming of the conflicts where the pair is fortified or debilitating. This will be what, a posteriori, the not so good election of pair certifies to us good or. Everything a challenge, since it requires tempo, dedication, work and emotional implication. In order to obtain this each player it can make the following thing: > To know its companion well. > To help the other whenever it is possible. > To provide positive reinforcements. > To be responsible to the maximum. > To communicate frankly, sincerity and assertiveness. > To solve the conflicts immediately. > To strive at any moment to the 100%. Later, the march of the competition will do the others, since the consolidation of a pair needs that some things leave from the beginning or or that at least...