Berlioz Bibliography Hello

Berlioz Bibliography Hello Obelix, I understand the literature of a wikipedia article does not have to be only that which has been used for writing, may well be a recommended reading list, and I put together the least representative of the ion on Berlioz in recent years. Still, Obelix, and what follows is going to respond to your complaint, claiming that everything he says the item is in the memoirs of Berlioz is absurd and shows that you have not read the reports or you do not know the sources of whence some information (sometimes prejudices) that are on Berlioz and readers have been reproduced in this article. Furthermore, as I organized the authors in languages with their own subtitles, the literature seems to occupy a large portion of the article, but in reality the number of authors is limited, believe me.All have influenced the wording of the article, since people who have been writing have been playing what these authors have written their works. Watch: For starters, if pretend that the article is based solely on the memoires would, by simple matter of honor and consistency, remove it from that Berlioz is a romantic or that once adhered to the romantic movement ... this idea is that authors such as Reynaud reproduce or Bartoli in Berlioz, la voix du romantisme (for example). Berlioz actually challenged that term, as is told: I am not a romantic. The biographical elements come in part from the autobiography of Berlioz (the m moires) but also by authors such as Kern Holoman, David Cairns, Claude Ballif and Fran ois Piatier (both launched in France a certain tradition and biographical literature on Berlioz). For example this phrase: Hector Berlioz died in Paris on 8 March 1869.He is buried in the cemetery of Montmartre with his two wives, Harriet Smithson ( 1854) and Marie Recio ( 1862), tell me if you can find in the memoirs of Berlioz. Do not :) This is very big: in the article cite the catalog of the works of Berlioz and cite the author (Kern Holoman) is an absurdity. Again I ask you if the article is based solely on the memoirs of Berlioz you look at these reports the catalog in question:))) One question, Obelix: how did Berlioz to mention the controversy in his memoirs of 2002 and 2003 panteonizaci n on your own body Scholars participated in this controversy as Reynaud, Bartoli, Cond , and Dartevel Pitarch, Bloom, or Wasselin Serna. A Cecile Reynaud should not be confused with Alain Reynaud, that's association president Hector Berlioz but not mentioned in the literature (nor I mention Dartevel to Pitarch, counties, Bloom ...). As you can see I have only the minimum ...In my opinion you should be satisfied with this literature, for two reasons: first, because it could be even longer, but is rather summary. The second source because it is representative of the contents of the article. Regards, Obelix, and thanks for your interest in the article, did you like the music of Berlioz Kintaro (Talk) 08:47, 25 September 2009 (UTC) Hello again, Obelix, and thanks for the goodwill you put into this issue (and congratulations on the citations and articles in which you participated). I'll have less time (issues of my personal life ...) and look at those books for the different events of this wikipedia article I take too long, at least much more than I can now devote to Wikipedia. If you can, as you suggest yourself, tell your guise appointments required in the body text of the article. I agree with you that the best solution. Sicer a salute and a hug. Kintaro (Talk) 14:32 26 Sep 2009 (UTC)