I wonder whether it would be desirable to find names for the categories that include the two genders, male and female, by a criterion of equality between men and women ... for example, up, move to births and deaths have you think that 'No if you are in the manual of style that evokes preocupacion.Saludos - SanchoPanzaXXI Your message to the island of Barataria 16:08 2 November 2007 (CET)
Gender in the categories is indistinct. I do not see a need for such relocation. But maybe you have another perception. 'Or Dark 16:30 2 November 2007 (CET)
I only know the word "sex", no "genre" (at least in Spanish, in English is another matter), if you are referring to biological traits, and no genre andalusia Linguistic. Moreover, are we "born" and "dead" does not include two sexes' Why is the plural as exclusively male ''''''''' (talk) 16:42 2 November 2007 (CET ) PS: And that I am a woman, but I think it has not prevail rioja "politically natural gas correct" on the "Linguistic correctness".
Rioja Linguistic correct it is macho, or at least it seems. : P not worry if the category is changed to 'People born / died in' or 'Births / Deaths', and everybody so happy. energy And I am a woman (Is that more or less gives value to my argument 'I think not Bea jiji). ) Saludetes Raystorm (Yes') 16:54 2 November 2007 (CET)
It is not that more or less value to your argument, it is assumed that gas such changes are made to feel that we are not offended. Indeed, our language is one of the least macho of the world, because their sex-specific vocabulary (remember that the vast majority of English adjectives no difference between male and female, even nouns that indicate profession or have an item for each gender). So I am shocked as to criticize the Spanish in this respect. I repeat that the plural encompasses both male and female, that has nothing to do to use a typically male desinencia neutral because both the male and the consolidated desinencias. You can say "born persons" perfectly, but I think in all the newspapers and encyclopedias that I have read is listed as "born dead", and this should not be an exception. I hate the politically correct, and I vote that the language does not discriminate, that discrimination is the company. '''''''' (Talk) 17:03 2 November 2007 (CET)
Er .... But really, Do you have objection to the change of name ': P Is it wrong what is proposed' Or is adapted to a sensitivity that, for better or for household worse, there 'is, that brings a plus to what is now not provide. Think gas about it. :) Raystorm (Yes') 17:07 2 November 2007 (CET)
But is it necessary or just for politically correct ' Why do you want to modify a standard expression usuada all encyclopedias and newspaper, if it is perfectly correct and not discriminate against anyone''''''''' (DISCUSION ) 17:09 2 November 2007 (CET)
Jus, What do you mean by politically correct 'Come on, do electricity ESCO not say something like if you drag the cat indoors, not so bad. XD Anyway, either you spend more widespread, that they do not have heating other individuals that govern our modus operandi (Is there anything left to either work '). Us s (jiji!) Have an ability to adapt to social realities that have no other encyclopedias. Why not use ': P If you want to adapt some of the sensitivities of this case, what's wrong with' I repeat: Is it wrong Linguistic ': P Raystorm (Yes') 17:16 2 November 2007 (CET)
Is wrong with that every day we become more tiquismiquis, and this also affects the language. For example, it does not distinguish "sex" "gender" because it took "genre" for good, without taking into account that in Spanish we have two different words to express what is "genre" and confused. The language has evolved to express more with fewer words and politically correct at this step is to obtain the 10 we use to express a single concept. Is not wrong, but unnecessary and cumbersome if the language and tends to dismiss as unnecessary in nature. '''''''' (Talk) 17:25 2 November 2007 (CET) PS: By the way, I will find some articles of the great Perez-Reverte in green energy speaking of energy costs this subject.
No forees. : P Te me going for these branches. Say it is not wrong. What's more, it is a sensibility that fits your own say (although that is not you feel good) that is what that is lying now and will aim in the future. : P I do not see it cumbersome, unlike a cooking gas change is greatly facilitated. Raystorm (Yes') 17:31 2 November 2007 (CET)
Forear is that language tends to be simplified and that the politically correct claims that this gets rid of one of their main ' Is not that go against' Sorry if fore, but expressed the view that philologists have the theme )'''''''' (talk) 17:35 2 November 2007 (CET)
in English 'look before DRAE: genre Class that belongs to name a noun or pronounby the fact conclude with a form, and usually only one of the bending of the adjective and pronoun.
